generated gpt
Crypto Supercycle: How Institutional Money Is Breaking the Four-Year Pattern
The four-year Bitcoin cycle is dead — institutional capital has rewritten the rules. Here's how spot ETFs, corporate treasuries, and regulatory clarity are driving the crypto supercycle.
Crypto investors have had more than a decade to get used to Bitcoin's cyclical price movements. It looked like this:
2013 (first cycle) — peak of $1,200;
2015 — bottom of $200;
2017 (second cycle) — peak of $12K;
2019 — bottom of $4K;
2021 (third cycle) — peak of $69K;
2022 — bottom of $20K;
2025 (fourth cycle) — peak of $126K;
2026 — expected bottom around $38-50K.
Based on this trend, it is more than logical to expect a new BTC rally to $200K and beyond in 2029. But some experts warn that this time things may not go according to plan, since a "supercycle" began in the market around 2024. This refers to a prolonged period of sustained market growth driven by fundamental rather than speculative factors. On April 4, 2026, Strategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor stated:
"Bitcoin has won. The global consensus is that BTC is digital capital. The four-year cycle is dead. Price is now determined by capital flows."
The reason is that institutional investment in crypto — asset managers, pension funds, corporate treasuries — is breaking the established paradigm.
Anatomy of the Old Market: Why the 4-Year Cycle Worked
Its logic is very simple:
every 4 years, the Bitcoin halving occurred: the reward to miners for new blocks is cut in half;
this caused a reduction in the inflow of new coins to the market and a supply shock;
as a result, BTC began to rise and dragged the rest of the coins with it;
as it grew, more and more liquidity flowed in from private investors trying to profit from the bull market. At some point, this caused overbought conditions;
a "bubble" inflated in the market, which inevitably burst, causing the price to crash by up to 80%.
So, in previous cycles, crypto's growth was tied to the mathematical factor of the halving, but even more to market psychology.
This is exactly where two fundamental changes are emerging.
As of December 2025, 19.9M BTC out of 21M have already been mined. In effect, miners are now barely supplying liquidity to the market and will not be supplying it. Thus, the halving is ceasing to be an important factor for price.
Throughout the entire existence of the crypto market, it was ruled by private capital, that is, retail money. This largely determined the market's character.
First, retail capital actively enters during the growth phase and instantly exits at the first signs of correction, since private investors and traders are highly susceptible to emotions.
Second, retail investors do not have a long-term planning horizon. Many, upon entering the market, are ready to leave it immediately after a price reversal.
It was precisely this market psychology that led to the fact that every 4 years we saw first a "bubble" and then a sharp correction. At first this was tied to the halving, and then — largely not so much to the halving itself as to psychological expectations about it. They worked as a self-fulfilling prophecy.
However, institutional investment in crypto is fundamentally changing the rules of the game.
Since corporate and fund strategies are built on a 5-10 year horizon, they do not react to short-term shocks and do not withdraw liquidity at the first correction;
Their entry into the market is not a one-off speculation but a systemic reallocation of assets.
This macroeconomic factor is turning the historical 4-year cycle into a supercycle of continuous growth. It is worth pondering this figure: according to Polygon Labs estimates, institutional investors accounted for about 95% of total capital inflow into the crypto market in 2025. The share of retail investors has shrunk to 5-6%. Thus, the crypto market is gradually becoming the opposite of itself.
Paradigm Shift: 3 Drivers of the New Supercycle
So, the constant inflow of institutional capital into the crypto market is fundamentally changing the rules of the game. Let's look at how this inflow occurs.
Spot ETFs and Legalization on Wall Street
January 2024 became a turning point, as spot Bitcoin ETFs emerged. Several of the largest funds launched them simultaneously, including:
BlackRock (IBIT) — $2.3B on the first day;
Grayscale (GBTC) — $1B;
Fidelity (FBTC) — $685M.
From that moment on, every investor gained the ability to invest in crypto without buying it directly or storing it in their own wallet.
The result exceeded all expectations. During 2024-2025, digital assets recorded a net inflow of $44B. At the same time, the volume of Bitcoin held in spot ETFs reached 1.5M coins, or 6-7% of total supply, according to Gate.com.
And this process, of course, is far from over. Everything suggests that lowering barriers for pension funds and asset managers will contribute to further inflows of institutional liquidity into the crypto market. The main barriers are regulatory uncertainty, the difficulty of buying and storing crypto independently, and high market volatility.
Their gradual disappearance has already caused enormous changes. A significant portion of liquidity has left the market, moving into funds. Against this backdrop, retail investors are less actively investing in BTC and ETH, focusing on altcoins and memecoins.
Corporate Treasuries and Hedging
Public companies are increasingly including digital assets on their balance sheets. And these are no longer isolated cases but a sustained trend. According to Bitwise, in Q3 2025 corporate Bitcoin adoption grew by 40%. Another 48 companies added it to their balance sheets, bringing the total to 172. Among them are Strategy, MARA Holdings, Tesla, and Coinbase.
As of mid-2026, all institutional investors (including funds, corporations, and governments) collectively control about 18.5% of the total Bitcoin supply. That is 3.88M BTC (data from Coinmarketcap.com).
A Capriole Investments study shows that corporate demand exceeds mining supply by 76%. This creates a constant (unlike the halving) and highly tangible structural imbalance between supply and demand in the crypto market. It directly follows that even in the absence of interest from private investors, Bitcoin's price will experience constant upward pressure.
Regulatory Clarity and New Accounting Standards
For institutional investors to actively invest in an asset, they must have the ability to do so legally. Crypto was long a dubious "gray zone." But the situation changed dramatically in 2023-2025.
In December 2023, a new rule, ASU 2023-08, issued by FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board), appeared. This official US body is responsible for developing generally accepted accounting principles. It is the one that determines the rules by which companies in the US keep their books and prepare financial statements.
The rule allowed companies to value their digital assets at current market price. Now any changes in value — both gains and losses — can be reflected in a company's profit or loss. Previously this was not possible (only the initial cost less impairment was reflected).
On July 18, 2025, another epochal event occurred. Donald Trump signed the GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act). It became the first large-scale federal law regulating stablecoins in the US and allowed banks to use them for settlements. It also clarified all nuances concerning KYC, AML, and reserve requirements.
In addition, at the end of 2024, the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation — MiCA — came into force in the European Union. This is the world's first comprehensive law: it covers not only stablecoins but virtually all crypto-assets not falling under traditional financial rules.
MiCA is quite strict. For example, it bans algorithmic stablecoins and any yield-bearing assets, and requires issuers to hold reserves at a 1:1 ratio to issued tokens. In addition, the European regulation forces large issuers to hold at least 60% of reserves as bank deposits in EU credit institutions.
Despite the law having been in force for quite some time, the "moment of truth" is arriving now. On July 1, 2026, the transition period ended for crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) operating under national licenses of individual EU countries. Now all companies wishing to serve clients in the EU must obtain a full MiCA license.
According to expert estimates, out of more than 1,200 companies with national registrations, only about 210 managed to obtain a full license. However, the process is gradually moving forward.
Despite the difference in approaches between the US and the EU, institutional investment in crypto can now legally enter the market through banks, not only through specialized crypto platforms. This "opens the doors wide" for large companies and is also a powerful driver of institutional capital inflow into the crypto market.
All of the above leads to a gradual departure from the familiar four-year cycle and its replacement by a crypto supercycle:
before: the familiar 4-year pattern of "hype — crash — recovery";
now: multi-year sustained growth driven by fundamental rather than speculative factors.
What the Supercycle Means for Corporate Finance
Unlike private investors, institutional investors are most interested not in unbridled Bitcoin growth but in the real advantages that the crypto market offers here and now.
Stablecoins, officially permitted in the US, are becoming a reliable tool for cross-border B2B payments. The institutional market is becoming stable; it provides constant demand and infrastructure resilience.
Corporations and even central banks are viewing crypto as a tool for hedging inflation and protecting capital from depreciation. This is especially relevant in an era of high inflation and weak fiat currencies.
New settlement instruments — stablecoins and tokenized real-world assets — are becoming part of corporate financial infrastructure. For example, according to a Coinbase exchange report, the RWA tokenization market grew by 210% from 2022 to 2025, reaching $18B. That is, traditional financial products (bonds, loans, real estate) are gradually moving into on-chain format. This opens up a wide range of opportunities for businesses for automated settlements and reduced transaction costs.
FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions
Does the supercycle eliminate bear markets and corrections?
Corrections remain part of the market, but their depth and duration are decreasing: 30-40% instead of 80%. Constant demand from ETFs and corporations creates a "price floor" that limits the depth of declines. In addition, institutional capital acts as a stabilizer. Funds do not withdraw liquidity during corrections but, on the contrary, use them to build up positions.
How should businesses reflect crypto on their balance sheets?
According to the FASB ASU 2023-08 standard, companies are required to reflect digital assets at fair value with revaluation recognized in net income. Previously they were accounted for at acquisition cost (less impairment). This is a fundamental change. At the same time, it is important to work through licensed OTC providers that provide full transaction reporting and ensure compliance with KYC/AML norms.
Why does retail capital no longer drive the market?
It all comes down to volumes. The cumulative inflow into spot Bitcoin ETFs in the first half of 2026 exceeded $58B, and corporate treasuries hold more than $117B in Bitcoin. These figures are many times greater than the capabilities of retail speculators.
